Taking on the complete nonsense that is claimed to be "climate science" --> Homogenization (written as homogenisation)

This is a time consuming idea, so this post is a bookmark at the moment.

 https://variable-variability.blogspot.com/2012/01/homogenization-of-monthly-and-annual.html

https://variable-variability.blogspot.com/2012/01/new-article-benchmarking-homogenization.html

For starters Googles Ngram viewer can find no books that have the word "homogenisation" in them.

California heat wave April 2022

 

GHCN data graphs from the actual raw data pulled from the GHCN website

 Graphs that show unadjusted temperature data are generated by my humble person, using software created by Tony Heller that uses the raw data online from the GHCN (global historic climate network)

A few examples of what is possible with just a mouse click

Many interesting things show up in the actual data, unlike the GISS/NOAA/HADCRUT/BEST "data", which is adjusted, homogenized, corrected and altered so much it no longer resembles actual measurements of weather, but appears as computer modeled "data", that does not match any real set of measurements.

Some examples are extremely obvious, while others are subtle, but all of the "adjustments" make any and all actual weather data appear to be the same, and almost all of it creates an illusion of unusual warming.

I should do an entire blog on just this sort of thing.  

"Hide the decline"

 Shortest version possible

Fact checking the GISS climate data (updated September 30 2022)

 It's very easy to do, but time consuming to show it, explain it, and get a blog post right to argue the case.  Hell, it's like writing a thesis.

Started a blog that is mostly just posting the data used in this onerous effort

https://whyidonotbelieveyou.blogspot.com